Lord Leverhulme’s 1911 concession in the Congo is now held by an African-run New York-based private equity firm with strong links to global philanthropy.
140 years ago this November at the Berlin Conference, Belgium’s King Leopold was recognized as the sole owner of the Congo Free State, a territory including the entirety of today’s Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Leopold’s reign was marked by slavery, millions of deaths, and widespread atrocities committed during the first colonial exploitation of the territory’s exceptional wealth of natural resources.
64 years after its independence, the Congo remains plagued by various forms of colonialism and extraction, resulting in massive human suffering, land grabs, human rights abuses, hunger, and poverty.
Following the brutal reign of King Leopold II in what was then considered his private property, the Congo became a Belgian colony in 1908. Three years later, the colonial authorities granted British industrialist Lord Leverhulme a license to create large-scale oil palm plantations on over 750,000 hectares. In addition to the theft of land from indigenous communities, historical records show that in the following decades, forced labor was used on a massive scale, enforced by the Belgian colonial army on behalf of Leverhulme.
With the goal of establishing a monopoly, local communities were prevented from cultivating and trading oil palm despite the fact that they had produced it long before Belgian colonization.
These plantations fuelled the rise of the Lever Brothers and laid the foundation of what is today one of the world’s largest multinational corporations – Unilever.
With their land forcibly stolen to establish the oil palm plantations, the Lokutu, Yaligimba, and Boteka communities in the DRC remain displaced and afflicted with human rights and environmental abuses today. Their livelihoods are severely impacted by the lack of land, a situation that has been worsening over time as the population grows. Hunger and poverty are widespread, and the dumping of untreated industrial waste has polluted major sources of drinking water. Unilever sold the plantations in 2002, and they have changed ownership a few times since.
Remarkably, the land that became the private property of a Belgian king 140 years ago has still not been returned to its Congolese owners. Instead, it is now controlled by a U.S.-based private equity fund, funneling profits to its high-profile investors, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust and endowments of several prestigious universities in the United States.
Community members who work as laborers on the plantations are subjected to unpaid wages and harsh working conditions. Their day-to-day life is plagued by violence and repression prosecuted by plantation security forces and police forces directed by the company, with a myriad of unlawful detentions, beatings, torture, and even murders. Residents in Lokutu rose in March 2019 when the Congolese police, who had been sent to end the demonstrations, ended up firing live bullets into the crowd.
In addition to this historical colonial exploitation, Congo continues to face new forms of extraction, with even more dire consequences for the Congolese people.
For the past three decades, the country has faced bloody conflicts, which have claimed millions of lives, particularly affecting the mineral-rich eastern region of the country. These wars not only destroy the country economically, they ruin its people, especially the women. The use of rape as a weapon in the Congo has been widely reported and is so prevalent that the country has been labeled the rape capital of the world.
The United Nations estimates that more than 200,000 Congolese women are rape survivors.
Congolese doctor, Denis Mukwege, the Nobel Prize winner who earned the moniker “the man who heals women”, has spoken about how the global demand for the mineral coltan, like rubber and oil palm during Leopold’s time, is fuelling conflict and consequently, rape in his country. Mukwege has highlighted that the problem is not just the Congolese men and government but pointed to the responsibility of the international community and the multinational corporations who benefit from Congo’s mineral wealth in ensuring the return of peace.
In his book King Leopold’s Ghost, the historian Adam Hochschild tells how the Congo has had the most difficulty escaping from the colonial powers even today.
“From the colonial era, the major legacy Europe left to Africa was not democracy as it is practiced today in countries like England, France, and Belgium; it was authoritarian rule and plunder. On the whole continent, perhaps no nation has had a harder time than the Congo in emerging from the shadow of its past.” But with a strong government and good leaders, they can ensure the atrocities that happened before will never happen again.
Unfortunately, even the best Congolese leadership may not prove enough in the face of the massive economic interests at play for the extraction of DRC’s exceptional mineral wealth at a time when many industries, from cell phones to electric cars, are boosting the demand and competition over the pricy resources.
Two neighboring countries, Rwanda and Uganda are extensively involved in illegal exploitation of DRC’s mineral resources and the violence that has plagued the eastern region in the past three decades.
In recent years, the Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 has intensified its activities, which resulted in the resurgence of widespread violence and massive displacement of people. For years, the United Nations has sounded the alarm over Rwanda’s continued assistance to the M23, putting forward solid evidence of the “direct involvement” of Rwandan Defense Forces in the conflict in eastern Congo-Kinshasa, as well as Rwanda’s provision of “weapons, ammunitions, and uniforms” to the M23 rebels. The United Nations has also implicated Uganda, which has allowed M23 “unhindered” access to its territory during its operations.
Despite this evidence, Western countries, especially the United States, have continued to provide support to the two countries, including military aid. This is happening despite the legal restrictions that are supposed to prohibit the US from releasing International Military Education & Training (IMET) funds to countries in the African Great Lakes region that “facilitate or otherwise participate in destabilizing activities in a neighboring country, including aiding and abetting armed groups.” Despite these restrictions, the US has continued to provide IMET assistance to Rwanda and Uganda every year to date. It was only in October 2023 that the US State Department placed Rwanda on a blacklist for violating the Child Soldiers Prevention Act (CSPA) due to Rwandan support for M23, which recruits child soldiers. Support to Uganda continues.
Violence is not the only consequence of the current forms of exploitation and extraction in the country.
Whether it is from the firms producing palm oil or from the tech companies profiting from mineral extraction, the exploitation of the DRC’s resources has had a dire impact on the country’s economy. Poverty and hunger are widespread through what has often been labeled as the “resource curse,” to describe countries not benefiting economically from their own natural resources. However, looking at the forces driving this exploitation, there is no curse. Rather, it is the cold and cynical attitude of governments and corporate actors that are to blame.
Republished article from africanarguments.org